Everything one needs to know about Scandinavia, unless you're visiting there. |
Scandinavia by Eric
De Maré, published in 1952, is billed as a travel guide and remains very relevant
today, on account of it having very little to do with vacation activities. Seventy
percent of this text recounts the history of Scandinavia while twenty percent
goes into detail about the architecture contained within and ten percent
follows the journey of the author through the countries. A one percent margin
of error contains the information that might actually be important for the
standard tourist.
This was the most useful part of the book. |
While not bone dry, it the sheer length of it decided that
it would make a better read during my trip instead of before it, seeing how
there was a six hour drive between Toronto and Montreal. Unfortunately this
plan did not take into account that I would be travelling with an attractive and
interesting French girl so it was read at night between reading modern Montreal
travel guides, which gave a glaring contrast to what Scandinavia was missing.
No info on food, but if you needed to recite a Swedish refrain... |
Split into three parts for each of the three main
Scandinavian nations, this book had a section each on Sweden, Denmark, and
Norway. Each section begins with a very in-depth look at the history of the
country, starting from prehistoric times (5000 B.C). Fifty or so pages later
the subject shifts to the culture of the country, and how it came to be. The
sections for Sweden and Norway were interesting, if for nothing more than the
insertion of random artworks, music scores, and umlauts, but the section on
Denmark left a bit to be desired since the cultural discussion lead back to the
inspection of the history of the country. Instead of concentrating on what Denmark
is like, the author chose to delve on what happened to it.
Everyone loves the Scream. |
Interwoven in the later parts of each chapter, though, is
the recounting of the trip the author took across each country. It meanders
quite a bit as tangents into the history of the country fly off left and right,
but it is still entertaining in how little time is spent seeing attractions
versus admiring the geography. Not the landscape, mind you, but the beauty of how towns
and rivers are laid out, which were somewhat already covered by the maps
preceding each chapter. The long descriptions on various forms of architecture
also seemed redundant since the best quality about this guide was that it had
ridiculously high amount of photographs of buildings.
Just like Montreal, if you squint at it from a distance. |
This is not all to say that the information in the book wasn’t
interesting, just that it was fairly useless for any tourist that wasn’t a
scholar of Scandinavian history. The important aspects of a travel guide, such
as where to eat, what to see, or how to say “Where is the bathroom?” in the
native tongues were missing, but I guess sometimes having no information on a
guide is better than having incorrect information such as, say, on the closing time of
the Montreal Botanical Gardens resulting in a certain Biblio-Mat blog-writing tourist getting locked in
and having to scale a turnstile and two eight-foot fences to get back to
civilization.
Book rating: 6/10 (At least the maps were useful)
Random quote: “The purpose of travel, a modern writer has
declared, is to obtain ecstasy. That is one of those wild, sweeping
generalizations which are helpful, if not entirely true.”
No comments:
Post a Comment